Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bhalchandra S. Poshe

High Court 07 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bhalchandra S. Poshe
Date of order
07 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003, 2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bhalchandra S. Poshe, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

hvnIN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri. Bhalchandra S. Poshe ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, A.P.P. for State. Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. This appeal relates to the Assessment Year 2002-2003 wherein the ITAT has deleted the addition of Rs.1,17,35,668/-. The counsel for the Revenue states that the said amount has been offered by the assessee for tax in the Assessment Year 2005-2006 and the same has been accepted by the Revenue. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. ( SMT.R.P, SONDURBALDOTA,, J. )(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan