The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Dilip M. Bang
High Court
17 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Dilip M. Bang
Date of order
17 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Dilip M. Bang, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Both these appeals are disposed of by this common order as common question of law arises. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 118 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shri. Dilip M. Bang ... Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 119 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shri. Kishore M. Bang ... Respondent
Mr. D.A. Athavale for the Appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2009
DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2009P.C.
DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2009
P.C.
. Both these appeals are disposed of by this common
order as common question of law arises.
. The appeal is in respect of block assessment
1.4.1991 to 31.3.2001.
. The question of law referred pertains to what is
known as "Dividend stripping".
. The said issue has been answered in favour of the
Assessee by the judgment of this court in CIT Vs.
M/s. Wallford Shres & stocks reported in 219 CTR
409. Considering the above, question of law as
framed would not arise and consequently appeals
disposed of.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.