The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Harpalsingh Sabarwal
High Court
03 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Harpalsingh Sabarwal
Date of order
03 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Harpalsingh Sabarwal, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.820 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.903 OF 2004WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.820 OF 2008IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.930 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Shri Harpalsingh Sabarwal
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/b K. Gopal for the respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3rd JULY, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The delay in preferring the Notice of Motion is of 1225 days. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned.
By consent of parties and for the reasons stated in the affidavit, appeal is restored to file.
Notice of Motion is made absolute.
Registry is directed to register the appeal and place it for admission.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue