Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Henrich Hunk

High Court 18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Henrich Hunk
Date of order
18 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Henrich Hunk, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 97 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 43 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Shri. Henrich Hunk ... Respondent Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant. Mrs. R.V. Thakkar for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 440 days. There is affidavit in support of the motion. The order was received by Commissioner of Income Tax - 26 on 02.07.2004. The file was forwarded to the Ministry of law after 29.10.2004. It is then set out that there was some dispute in drafting the appeal between the Panel Counsel and the Income Tax Department and the new panel was constituted only in the month of May, 2005. The appeal was preferred on 13.1.2006. There is no explanation for the delay. In our opinion, therefore, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. ((-2-)) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan