The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Jayadev Raja
High Court
18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Jayadev Raja
Date of order
18 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Jayadev Raja, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 107 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 44 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shri. Jayadev Raja ... Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007P.C.:
DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
P.C.:
. There is delay of 440 days. There is affidavit
in support of the motion. The order was received by
Commissioner of Income Tax - 26 on 02.07.2004. The
file was forwarded to the Ministry of law after
29.10.2004. It is then set out that there was some
dispute in drafting the appeal between the Panel
Counsel and the Income Tax Department and the new
panel was constituted only in the month of May,
2005. The appeal was preferred on 12.1.2006. There
is no explanation for the delay. In our opinion,
therefore, the cause shown would not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue