Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri K...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Kulbhushan W.jain & Ors

High Court 11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Kulbhushan W.jain & Ors
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Kulbhushan W.jain & Ors, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.378 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. Shri Kulbhushan W.Jain & Ors.. ..Respondents Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the Appellant. Mr. S.N. Inamdar with Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the respondents. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 P.C.: . ITAT on the facts on record held that there was no AOP. It has given reasons as to why it has come to that conclusion.. From the facts we find that several persons agreed to purchase distinct shares in a property for which they paid distinct consideration. The various shares were sold to them also to the extent of their share and it is in these circumstances that the Tribunal recorded a finding that there was no AOP. This will be purely a finding of fact and in the absence of Appellants pointing out any perversity no interference called for. The question of law as framed would not arise and consequently Appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan