The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Nishit M. Desai, Mumbai
High Court
15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Nishit M. Desai, Mumbai
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Nishit M. Desai, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shri. Nishit M. Desai, Mumbai. ... Respondent
Mr. A.D. Kango with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the
Appellant.
Ms. Asifa Khan for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. The question of law as formulated in Para 5 of
the appeal memo. There are two concurrent findings
of fact. Apart from that the tribunal relied in the
judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Sakharchand
Chhaganlal Vs. Controller of Estate Duty, 73 ITR
555. In our opinion, the question of law as
formulated would not arise. Consequently appeal
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue