The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Omprakash Khatri, Mumbai
High Court
15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Omprakash Khatri, Mumbai
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Omprakash Khatri, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 252 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shri. Omprakash Khatri, Mumbai. ... Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani i/by Mr. P.Y. Vaidya for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 15, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. The appeal is in respect of the assessment block
period 30.11.1985 to 6.12.1996. We have perused the
findings recorded by the tribunal. Nothing has been
pointed out to us to show that the said finding is
perverse. The question of law is based on facts
which facts have been found in favour of the
assessee by the tribunal. In the light of that the
question as framed would not arise. Hence, appeal
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue