Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri O...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Omprakash Mehra (Huf

High Court 22 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Omprakash Mehra (Huf, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The learned counsel for the appellant states that though this notice of motion was taken out in 2005, he is not aware whether the same was served on the respondent.

Decision: In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) 491 of 2005 also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1123 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.491 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Shri Omprakash Mehra (HUF) .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant None for the respondent CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2008 DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2008 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the appellant states that though this notice of motion was taken out in 2005, he is not aware whether the same was served on the respondent. He does not have the papers. He is unable to assist the court in this regard. Notice of Motion is therefore, dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) 491 of 2005 also stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.