The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Pravin D.mehta
High Court
12 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Pravin D.mehta
Date of order
12 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Pravin D.mehta, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Issue: Mr.Kazi states that he has no knowledge whether the respondent has been served or not.
Decision: In such circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the above appeal. -2- 3.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No.1574 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
-25, C-11 ..Appellant
vs.
Shri Pravin D.Mehta ..Respondent
Mr.N.A.Kazi for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 12th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
12th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard Mr.Kazi, the learned Counsel appearing for the
appellant.
2. The above appeal was lodged on 1st December, 2007 and
was numbered on 26th December, 2007. Mr.Kazi states that
he has no knowledge whether the respondent has been served
or not. Mr.Kazi appeared on 29th July, 2008 and assured
to file the vakalatnama and also to serve the respondent.
Now, Mr.Kazi has filed the vakalatnama, however, Mr.Kazi
very fairly states that the appellant/department has not
even handed over the brief to the learned Counsel. In
such circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the
above appeal.
-2-
3. In the above appeal it is not that the appellant was
not aware that the matter had come up for admission. In
fact, on 15th July, 2008 Ms.Jayanti V.Nayak, Ward
Inspector, ACIT, Range 25(3) was personally present for
the appellant and on that day on her request we adjourned
the appeal to 29th July, 2008 on which date Mr.Kazi
appeared.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.