Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Rafique A. Malik

High Court 14 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Rafique A. Malik
Date of order
14 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Rafique A. Malik, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2007 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Shri. Rafique A. Malik ... Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for Appellant. Ms. Priya Damle for Respondent. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI&A.A. KUMBHAKONI,JJ.DATED: JULY 14, 2008 CORAM: BILAL NAZKI A.A. KUMBHAKONI,JJ. DATED: JULY 14, 2008 P.C. P.C. . Heard the counsels. The question raised in this appeal is a question of fact. Similar view was taken by the Division Bench in Income Tax Appeal No. 367 of 2002 and Batch. Therefore, this Appeal is dismissed. (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)(BILAL NAZKI,J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan