The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Satish Kumar Singodia
High Court
13 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Satish Kumar Singodia
Date of order
13 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Satish Kumar Singodia, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2010
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.,
Versus
SHRI SATISH KUMAR SINGODIA.,
... Appellant... Respondent
Ms. A. Desai, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. A. F. Diniz and Mr. Arun Bras de Sa, Advocates for therespondent.
P.C.:
Ms. A. Desai, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant hasplaced on record a communication dated 17/03/2016, sent by theOffice of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Panaji, Goa,based on revision of monetary limits in Circular No.21/2015 dated10/12/2015 of the CBDT for withdrawing pending appeals belowspecified tax limits. A copy of the said communication is marked"X" for identification. The learned Counsel, as such, seeks leave towithdraw the appeal for the aforesaid reasons.
The appeal is, accordingly, allowed to be withdrawn. Disposedof accordingly.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
F. M. REIS, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue