Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Shankar Sharma

High Court 18 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Shankar Sharma
Date of order
18 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Shankar Sharma, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Shri Shankar Sharma ...Respondent Mrs. Devki Iyer for the Appellant. Mr. P.C. Tripathi with Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the judgment of this court in Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Star Chemicals, 220 CTR 317 and in Director of Income Tax, International Taxation Versus Oman International Bank, SAOG in Income Tax Appeal No. 114 of 2009 decided on 9.2.2009. The question of law as framed would not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan