Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Suresh K. Jajoo

High Court 03 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Suresh K. Jajoo
Date of order
03 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Suresh K. Jajoo, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In these circumstances the present Appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

kps *1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.155 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant -Versus- Shri Suresh K. Jajoo. ..Respondent ........... Mr.A.R. Malhotra with Mr.N.A. Kazi, for the Appellant/ Revenue.Mr.Niraj Seth i/by Mint & Conferers, for the Respondent/ Assessee............ CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- 03[rd] July, 2014 P.C.: 1Having heard Mr.Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the Revenue and Mr.Niraj Seth, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/ Assessee we are of the opinion that the matter is covered by the order dated 22.01.2013 passed by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.821/2011. The parties are also common and equally the issue. In these circumstances the present Appeal is also dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan