Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.a.bhogilal None For The Parties

High Court 16 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.a.bhogilal None For The Parties
Date of order
16 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.a.bhogilal None For The Parties, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.219 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Shri.A.A.BhogilalNone for the parties. ..Applicant ..Respondent CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2007P.C..None appears for the parties. The record andproceeding are also not traced. In thesecircumstances, the record cannot be reconstructed.Hence, the Income Tax Application stands dismissed indefault. (V.C.AGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan