Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.h...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.hanumant S.tambe

High Court 15 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.hanumant S.tambe
Date of order
15 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.hanumant S.tambe, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in confirming theorder of CIT(A) in deleting the disallowanceof depreciation on machinery value of Rs.4.06lac rightly made by the Assessing Officer?b.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1069 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Shri.Hanumant S.Tambe ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.N.Joshi a/w.V.V.Khemkar for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By the above Appeal, the Appellant is seeking to raise the following substantial questions of law. a. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in confirming theorder of CIT(A) in deleting the disallowanceof depreciation on machinery value of Rs.4.06lac rightly made by the Assessing Officer?b. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in affirming theorder of the Ld. CIT(A) deleting the additionof Rs.10.73 lac made by Assessing Officertowards unexplained investment in agriculturalland without appreciating in properprospective the entries in the seized papersand the evidentiary value of the seizedproperty documents which are bearing thumbimpression/signature of the concerned parties?c. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in upholding theLd.CIT(A)’s order in deleting the addition ofRs.3 lac made by the AO; relating to loan law involved in the above Appeal. The Appeal is devoid of merits. Hence, the same stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan