The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.hanumant S.tambe
High Court
15 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.hanumant S.tambe
Date of order
15 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.hanumant S.tambe, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in confirming theorder of CIT(A) in deleting the disallowanceof depreciation on machinery value of Rs.4.06lac rightly made by the Assessing Officer?b.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1069 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Shri.Hanumant S.Tambe
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.N.Joshi a/w.V.V.Khemkar for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
the above Appeal, the Appellant is seeking to raise
the following substantial questions of law.
a. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in confirming theorder of CIT(A) in deleting the disallowanceof depreciation on machinery value of Rs.4.06lac rightly made by the Assessing Officer?b. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in affirming theorder of the Ld. CIT(A) deleting the additionof Rs.10.73 lac made by Assessing Officertowards unexplained investment in agriculturalland without appreciating in properprospective the entries in the seized papersand the evidentiary value of the seizedproperty documents which are bearing thumbimpression/signature of the concerned parties?c. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Hon’bleTribunal was right in law in upholding theLd.CIT(A)’s order in deleting the addition ofRs.3 lac made by the AO; relating to loan
law involved in the above Appeal. The Appeal is
devoid of merits. Hence, the same stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.