The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.k.v.abdul Nazar
High Court
25 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.k.v.abdul Nazar
Date of order
25 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.k.v.abdul Nazar, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2064 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.856 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Shri.K.V.Abdul Nazar
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Applicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2007P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.By this Notice of Motion the Applicant is seekingcondonation of delay in filing the above Appeal.Perused the Notice of Motion and theaffidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons statedtherein sufficient cause is made out for condoning thedelay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case ofinaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the partof the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue