The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.mahendra B.goyal
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.mahendra B.goyal
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.mahendra B.goyal, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.987 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.987 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.987 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.737 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.737 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
Vs.
Shri.Mahendra B.Goyal ..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 1029 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal against the order dated 17/06/2004, passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Perused the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. It
appears that the last date for filing of Appeal was
17/05/2005. The Commissioner of Income Tax had granted
approval for filing an Appeal on 06/05/2005 however, the
Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 10/03/2008 i.e.
after a lapse of almost two years and ten months.
2. The reasons given for delay that of getting the
draft memo of Appeal prepared and non-availability of
Court fee stamps etc. does not appear to be
justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for
condoning the delay. We are not satisfied with the
reasons given for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice
3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income
Tax Appeal (L) No.737 of 2008 also stands dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.