Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n.chandra, Mumbai

High Court 30 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n.chandra, Mumbai
Date of order
30 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n.chandra, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.596 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.596 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.596 OF 2008 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.511 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.511 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.511 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.193 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.193 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.193 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. Shri.N.Chandra, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.Sameer Dalal i/by Mr.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE : 30th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Notice of Motion. Hence, the Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan