The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n.chandra, Mumbai
High Court
30 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n.chandra, Mumbai
Date of order
30 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.n.chandra, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.596 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.596 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.596 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.511 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.511 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.511 OF 2006
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.193 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.193 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.193 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
Shri.N.Chandra, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.Sameer Dalal i/by Mr.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
DATE : 30th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Notice of Motion. Hence, the Notice of
Motion is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.