The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.parasram C.rohira
High Court
10 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.parasram C.rohira
Date of order
10 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.parasram C.rohira, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3437 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1613 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Shri.Parasram C.Rohira
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of 473 days delay caused in filing theabove Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion andAffidavit-in-support thereof. It appears that thefinal approval for filing the Appeal was granted on28th March,2006. However, the Appeal came to be filedon 17th July,2007 i.e. after a gross delay of almost16 months. The only reason given for the said delayis, that due to non-availablity of stamp-papers, theAppeal could not be filed in time. We are not at allsatisfied with the reasons given. No sufficient cause
is made out for condoning the delay. Hence, the
Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue