The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.prakashchandra K.jain
High Court
23 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.prakashchandra K.jain
Date of order
23 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.prakashchandra K.jain, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.743 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.743 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
Shri.Prakashchandra K.Jain .. Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.Pramod Kumar Parida for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE : 23rd April, 2008
DATE : 23rd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal, as the tax effect is less than
Rs.4 lakhs. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be
refunded to the Appellant as per the rules. The
question of law is kept open for consideration in the
appropriate proceedings.
2. In view of withdrawal of the Appeal itself, nothing
further survives in the Notice of Motion No.1470/2008,
and hence, the said Notice of Motion also stands
dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.