Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.r...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.r.g.shah

High Court 04 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Jun 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.r.g.shah, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.382 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.98 OF 2004 WITHIN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.384 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.96 OF 2004 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.385 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.95 OF 2004 WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.386 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.99 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Shri.R.G.Shah ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.S.M.Shah, A.G.P.for the Appellants.None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 4TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants.By these Notices of Motion the Appellants are seekingcondonation of delay in filing the above Appeals.Perused the Notices of Motion and theaffidavits-in-support thereof. For the reasons statedtherein sufficient cause is made out for condoning thedelay in filing the above Appeals. There is no caseof inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicants. Hence, the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.