The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shubhakaran G.bajaj
High Court
28 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shubhakaran G.bajaj
Date of order
28 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shubhakaran G.bajaj, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TAX APPEAL NO.461 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.461 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
Shubhakaran G.Bajaj .. Respondent
Mr.N.A.Kazi for the Appellant.
Respondent in person present.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 28th August, 2008
DATE : 28th August, 2008
DATE : 28th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Mr.Kazi, the learned Advocate for the Appellant
undertakes to file his vakalatnama within a period of
two weeks from today. The learned Advocate for the
Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal as the tax
effect involved is less than Rs.4 lakhs. Hence, the
Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as
per the Rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue