The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shyam Sunder Hurgat
High Court
18 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shyam Sunder Hurgat
Date of order
18 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shyam Sunder Hurgat, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of that there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shyam Sunder Hurgat ... Respondent
Mr. S.K. Bhatnagar with Mr.N.R. Prajapati for the
Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The question of law as framed are covered by the
judgment of this court in Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs. Inder V. Nankani in Income Tax Appeal NO. 128
of 2009 decided on 24.2.2009.
. In the light of that there is no merit in this
appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue