In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. S.j.kathawalla Jj, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No. 1038 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
vs.
Smt.Madhvi J.Singh ...Respondent
Mr.N.R.Prajapati for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 12th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
12th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.
Learned Counsel for the appellant states that there is no
substantial question of law involved in the above appeal
and the same should be dismissed. In view of the above,
we dismiss the appeal.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue