The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smruty Organics Ltd
High Court
17 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smruty Organics Ltd
Date of order
17 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smruty Organics Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 407 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Smruty Organics Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the
Appellant.
Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 17, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 17, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. As the tax incidence is less than Rs. 4 lakhs,
the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the
Appeal and Motion. Hence, Appeal and Motion
dismissed as withdrawn. The issue of law, if any,
is kept open for consideration in appropriate case.
Refund of court fees as per rules. C.C. expedited.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue