The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Smt Sushila B. Shah
High Court
05 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Smt Sushila B. Shah
Date of order
05 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Smt Sushila B. Shah, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2793 OF 2008.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2793 OF 2008.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2793 OF 2008.
The Commissioner of Income-tax. .. Appellant.
Vs
Smt Sushila B. Shah. .. Respondent.
Mr A. S. Shivsaran, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr Sharan Jagtiani with Mr Azizkhan i/b Divya Shah &
Associate for the Respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 5th DECEMBER, 2008.
DATED: 5th DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:----
----
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. We have perused the Tribunal’s order dated
26.3.2008. The Tribunal has considered the entire
issue at length. Paragraph 2 of the order dated
26.3.2008 runs as under:
"The learned counsel for the Assessee, at the
out set, has brought to our notice that the
issue under appeal is covered in favour of the
assessee by the decision of the co-ordinate
bench in the case of the co-owner, Shri Harish
P. Shah in ITA No.1158/Mum/2001 E-Bench order
dated 13th August, 2004 and in the case of
Shri Mohanlal K. Shah, H.U.F. in ITA No.
722/Mum/2003 and ITA No.7161/Mum/2003 for the
very same assessment year 1997-98 E-Bench
order dated 22.09.2004 and 24.09.2004
respectively. The learned Departmental
representative, though not leaving his ground,
has ultimately conceded to the above
proposition. Respectfully following the
co-ordinate bench decisions, we reject the
ground taken by the Revenue."
3. We have also perused the order of this Court
in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 209 of 2006 dated
26.3.2008.
4. In view of the above, there is no substantial
question of law involved in the present appeal. We do
not find any case made out for admission of the above
appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
(V.C. DAGA,J)
(V.C. DAGA,J)(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(V.C. DAGA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.