Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sutlej...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sutlej Industries Ltd

High Court 21 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

21 Jul 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sutlej Industries Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIR-22. + ITA 437/2004 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel. versus SUTLEJ INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 21.07.2016 1. Learned counsel for the Revenue points out that the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. He states that in view of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10[th] December 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, he does not press this appeal. 2. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. S. MURALIDHAR, J JULY 21, 2016/dn NAJMI WAZIRI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.