Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tat Ir...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tat Iron & Steel Co.ltd

High Court 16 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tat Iron & Steel Co.ltd
Date of order
16 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tat Iron & Steel Co.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Tat Iron & Steel Co.Ltd. ..Applicant ..Respondent Mr.Ashok Kotangale, A.G.P. for the Applicant.Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Dinesh Vyas for the Respondent. P.C. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2007 Assessee. In view thereof, the present Application stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan