The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd
High Court
17 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd
Date of order
17 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1643 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 721 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd... Respondent
Mr.B.M. Chatterji for the Appellant.
Mr. P.S.Tripathi for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 17, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 17, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. Considering the question of law and cause shown
in our opinion, this would be a fit case to condone
the delay subject to appellant paying to respondents
cost quantified at Rs.7500/- within twelve weeks
from today and further removing all office
objections that may be there also within twelve
weeks from today.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue