Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata E...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive

High Court 25 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive
Date of order
25 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Reference No.119 of 1998 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant vs. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. ..Respondent Mrs.Devak Iyer for appellant. Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. Mr.Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent very fairly states that the question of law referred to this Court in the above reference has already been answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue by the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Mercantile Bank Ltd. reported in 237 ITR 676. Accordingly the question of law referred to this Court by the above reference is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. -2- (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan