In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Engineering & Locomotive, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Reference No.119 of 1998
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
vs.
Tata Engineering & Locomotive
Co. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mrs.Devak Iyer for appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
25th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. Mr.Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent very fairly states that the question of law
referred to this Court in the above reference has already
been answered against the assessee and in favour of the
revenue by the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of
Income Tax Vs.Mercantile Bank Ltd. reported in 237 ITR
676. Accordingly the question of law referred to this
Court by the above reference is answered in favour of the
revenue and against the assessee.
-2-
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.