In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Tata Hydro Electric Power Supply Co.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of dismissal of Notices of Motion, all the above appeals stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Tata Hydro Electric Power Supply Co.Ltd.
..Appellant..Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1479 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4161 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Tata Chemicals Ltd.
..Appellant..Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4138 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Tata Power Co. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1494 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4135 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Tata Electric Co.Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellantMr.Ajit Shah with Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE : 11[th] June, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused Notices of Motion for condonation of delay and affidavits in support thereof. Delay in all these appeals is ranging from 638 days to 1687 days. Having gone through the Notices of Motion and affidavits in support thereof, we find no reason to condone the delay. No sufficient ground is made out for condonation of delay. No material is available on record warranting condonation of delay. The prayer for condonation of delay is rejected. Notices of Motion stand dismissed.
In view of dismissal of Notices of Motion, all the above appeals stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.