The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Technova Imaging Systems Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Technova Imaging Systems Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Technova Imaging Systems Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4568 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1275 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Technova Imaging Systems Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. A.D. Kango for the Appellant.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 09, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
548 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that the filing of the appeal was approved
by C.C.I.T. (IV) on 11.1.2005 and the appeal was
filed on 19.7.2006. No dates have been given in
respect of the events occured between these two
daets. In our view, the delay between the period of
11.1.2005 and 19.7.2006 has not been properly
explained. In the circumstances, sufficient cause
is not shown to condone the delay. Hence, Notice of
Motion is dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue