Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Al...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The All. India Plastic Mnfrs. Assoc

High Court 18 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The All. India Plastic Mnfrs. Assoc
Date of order
18 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The All. India Plastic Mnfrs. Assoc, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 148 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 39 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus The All. India Plastic Mnfrs. Assoc. Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango for the Appellants. Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondnet. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is delay of 555 days. There is affidavit in support of the motion. The order was received by Director of Income Tax (E) on 10.03.2004. Scrutiny report was called for only on 05.04.2004. The draft was sent to Law Ministry on 18.6.2004. The Panel Counsel drafted appeal memo on 24.3.2005. Once again the draft was sent to Law Ministry on 24.8.2005. It is set out that there was unavailability of the stamp papers and the same is received on 27.12.2005. The appeal was filed on 12.01.2006. There is no explanation for the said delay. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. ((-2-)) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan