Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The De...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Delay Is Less Than 200 Days

High Court 17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Delay Is Less Than 200 Days
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Delay Is Less Than 200 Days, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 517 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.227 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant Vs. M/s Godrej GE Appliance Ltd.Mr. A.S. Rao for Appellant.Ms. S. Vedpathak for respondent .... Respondent CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. . The delay is less than 200 days. Considering the practical difficulties which theDepartment was facing including referring thematters to the Law Department, Government of Indiafor drafting the Appeal Memo and considering theaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, inour opinion, the cause shown would amount tosufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. TheNotice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a). 2. Office to register the Appeal. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan