In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Hongkong And Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1611 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate with Mr.B.D.Damodar i/b.Kanga & Co. for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2009
DATE :
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. (2008) 299 ITR 356 (Bom.) and the same has been affirmed by the Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. L & T. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue