Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Ma...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Maharashtra State Co-Op.cotton

High Court 01 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Maharashtra State Co-Op.cotton
Date of order
01 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Maharashtra State Co-Op.cotton, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence all the four Appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and stand dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2000 WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1011 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1011 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1011 OF 2000 WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1202 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1202 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1202 OF 2000 WITH WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1203 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1203 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1203 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. The Maharashtra State Co-op.Cotton Growers Marketing Fed.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan for the Appellant. Mr.S.D.Satpute, Account Officer of Respondent present. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 1st August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Vaishampayan, the learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file vakalatnama in all the aforesaid four Appeals within a period of one week from today. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mr.S.D.Satpute - who has been authorised to appear by the General Manager of the Maharashtra State Co-op.Cotton Growers Marketing Federation Limited. Mr.Satpute fairly brought to our notice that the above Appeals have now become infructuous in view of the subsequent order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 4.2.2002 whereby the Tribunal has recalled its earlier order dated 8.7.1999 and the matter has been decided in favour of the Revenue. ( 2 ) 3. In view of the above, the learned Counsel Mr.Vaishampayan appearing for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw these Appeals. Hence all the four Appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and stand dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan