The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Shahada People Co-Operative Bank Ltd
High Court
10 Apr 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Shahada People Co-Operative Bank Ltd
Date of order
10 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Shahada People Co-Operative Bank Ltd, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4327 OF 2015 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.31 OF 2014
(The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. The Shahada People Co-operative Bank Ltd.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri A.D. Soman, Advocate for applicantShri Badakh, Advocate holding forShri Y.G. Gujarathi, Advocate for respondent
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED :
10th April, 2015.
1.Mr. Soman, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the registry erroneously dismissed the Appeal. Bhatta was directed to be paid within two weeks from 12.11.2014. Bhatta was paid on 17.11.2014 and even the learned counsel has appeared in the matter.
2.Mr. Badakh, learned counsel accepts that he has appeared for Mr. Gujarathi, learned counsel for the sole respondent.
3.In light of the above, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and stands disposed of.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.