Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Sh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Shivram Co-Op.housing Society Ltd

High Court 20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Shivram Co-Op.housing Society Ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Shivram Co-Op.housing Society Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.181 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. The Shivram Co-op.Housing Society Ltd. ..Respondent ..Applicant Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Applicant.None for the Respondent. P.C. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 20TH MARCH, 2007 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised: "In the facts of the case and in law, whetherthe learned members of the Tribunal werejustified in holding that the possession ofthe plot of land admeasuring 1672 sq.mts., wasgiven in stages and hence transfer of capitalasset has taken place in stages as providedunder Section 2(47)(v) and accordingly capitalgains has to be charged in the relevant yearsas returned by the assessee withoutappreciating the facts that the possession ofone single plot of 1672 sq.mts., cannot begiven in stages by bits and pieces on thebasis of one single agreement dated 26thJune,1992?" question of law. Accordingly, the Application stands disposed of. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan