In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The<Br>Learned<Br>Counselfor<Br>Theappellant<Br>Seeks<Br>Leave, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1198 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd.Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
..Appellant
..Respondent
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2007
P.C.
be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court
Fees be refunded to the Appellant, as per rules.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
to
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue