In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The<Br>Learned<Br>Counselfor<Br>Theappellant<Br>Seeks<Br>Leave, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1197 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant
Vs.M/s.Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd.Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
..Respondent
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2007
P.C.
be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court
Fees be refunded to the Appellant, as per rules.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
to
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue