In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Udayan Bose, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2279 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Udayan Bose
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant.
Mr.B.D.Damodar i/b. Kanga & Co. for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 14TH OCTOBER, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.Perused appeal.
2.Learned Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs.Narendra D.Desai 214 CTR (Bom.) 190 and the Tribunal has also relied on the same judgment. Learned Counsel for the appellant could not distinguish the same. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue