Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Union...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Union Bank Of India

High Court 07 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Union Bank Of India
Date of order
07 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Union Bank Of India, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.260 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Vs. Union Bank of India ..Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the Applicant CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 7TH JANUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 7TH JANUARY,2008 P.C.: P.C.: . Appeal preferred by the Revenue was dismissed by ITAT as permission of the Committee of Secretaries had not been obtained. This appeal has also been preferred without obtaining permission of the Committee of Secretaries. On behalf of the Revenue learned Counsel states that till date they have not received permission. 2. Considering the above the Application dismissed for non-prosecution. Liberty to the Revenue to file appropriate proceedings if permission is granted. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan