The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Varkey C.samuel
High Court
10 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Varkey C.samuel
Date of order
10 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Varkey C.samuel, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2433 OF 2007WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4040 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Varkey C.Samuel
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Asthe tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/- in theabove, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeksleave to withdraw the above Appeal. The Appeal isallowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the Appellant,
as per rules.
2.In view of the withdrawal of the above Appeal,
nothing further survives in the Notice of Motion.
Hence, the same stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue