The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vijay Paper Udyog
High Court
23 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vijay Paper Udyog
Date of order
23 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vijay Paper Udyog, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Inthe above, the Appellant is seeking to raise thefollowing substantial question of law:Whether on the facts and circumstances of thecase and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal haserred in directing the Assessing Officer toallow deduction under Section 80-IA ofRs.17,38,868/-?2.It is apparent from the ques...
Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.931 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.Vijay Paper Udyog
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.D.K.Kanwal for the Appellant.Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla with A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Inthe above, the Appellant is seeking to raise thefollowing substantial question of law:Whether on the facts and circumstances of thecase and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal haserred in directing the Assessing Officer toallow deduction under Section 80-IA ofRs.17,38,868/-?2.It is apparent from the question framed, thatthe challenge is with regard to findings of facts.There is absolutely no question of law, involved in
the above Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue