The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vimal Fabrics Ltd
High Court
27 Feb 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vimal Fabrics Ltd
Date of order
27 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vimal Fabrics Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.979 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.Vimal Fabrics Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevaa for the Appellant.Mr.J.D.Mistry with Raj Darak for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 27TH FEBRUARY,2007
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
The above Appeal is admitted on the following
substantial questions of law:
1."Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in law in holding that the assessee wasentitled for deduction under Section 80-M at60% of the gross dividend of Rs.15,68,795/- oran amount of Rs.52,505/- ought to be reducedas the assessee had invested interest bearingfunds in the purchase of shares and deductionunder Section 80-M is allowable on netdividend only ?"2."Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in law in holding that the commissionpaid on sales could not be included incomputing the disallowance under Section37(3A) as the same was not sales promotionexpenses?"
Circular dated 27th March,2000, we dismiss the above
Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.