In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Virendra Kumar Agarwal, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2067 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.638 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Virendra Kumar Agarwal
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3rd JULY, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. In spite of service nobody is appearing on behalf of respondent. The delay in filing the above appeal is of 43 days. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute. Registry is directed to register the appeal and place it for admission.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue