Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Viswas...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Viswasrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 11 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Viswasrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Viswasrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter the appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.229 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Viswasrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan h/f. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 11TH AUGUST, 2009 DATE : P.C. Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states, that the issue involved in the appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2008) 301 ITR 191. In this view of the matter the appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan