The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Xlo India Ltd
High Court
25 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Xlo India Ltd
Date of order
25 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Xlo India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question of law proposed to be framed in the present appeal reads as under: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the proportionate disallowance of interest on the interest free loans and advances to : 2 : sister concerns?" 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1280 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax ...Appellant
Versus
XLO India Ltd. ...Respondent
......
Mr.A.D.Kango i/b Mr.R.N.Bandopadhyay for Appellant.
Mr.S.G.Dalal for Respondent.
......
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & V.M.KANADE, J.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
V.M.KANADE, J.
DATED: JUNE 25, 2008.
DATED: JUNE 25, 2008.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Challenge in the present Appeal is to the
order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
dated 26th April 2000. The question of law
proposed to be framed in the present appeal reads
as under:
"Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
was right in law in deleting the
proportionate disallowance of interest on
the interest free loans and advances to
: 2 :
sister concerns?"
2. We may notice that the above question, in
the facts and circumstances of the case, can hardly
be treated as substantial question of law, inasmuch
as, it is purely based on given facts of the case.
The Tribunal in the impugned order had clearly held
that the Department had failed to prove any nexus
between the borrowed funds and the advances alleged
to have given to the sister concern. It was also
noticed that in the earlier years, the view of the
Tribunal was in favour of the assessee and even for
the consistent years, the same view was followed by
the Tribunal. It is not even the case that for the
earlier financial year relating to the same
assessee, the Department has questioned the
correctness of the order of the Tribunal
successfully. No question of law. Dismissed.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
V.M.KANADE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.