Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Yogesh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Yogesh K. Thakkar

High Court 03 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

03 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

1990-91

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Yogesh K. Thakkar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the same reasons, there is no merit in this appeal which is also accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1374 OF 2008 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1374 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Yogesh K. Thakkar ... Respondent Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant. Ms.Asifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: MARCH 03, 2009 DATED: MARCH 03, 2009 DATED: MARCH 03, 2009 P.C. P.C. . The appeal is in respect of assessment year 1989-90. In respect of the very same issue for the assessment year 1990-91, Income Tax Appeal No. 1373 of 2008 has been dismissed. For the same reasons, there is no merit in this appeal which is also accordingly dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.